This essay is a bilateral analysis Between the “Department of Life and Human Genetics” (done at Various times at the University of Monterrey) and class: “From utopia to reality.”
Since 2000 I have Attempted to draft global plan or human genome, According To Xavier Soberon Mainer, in 2005 you Should Have a plan Almost complete human genome.
There is undoubtedly a social and ethical science Seems Advance and not to stop, no matter on what basis is the progress, There Will Always Be Private Individuals Who Want and are willing to experiment with Other Human Beings Beings are thinking, rational Can Be Benefit or Affected by scientific Developments.
A situation of social (as the study of the human genome, ITS components Chromosomes Such as “x”, “y”, of the proteins are produced and That Which are NECESSARY to store and send information), Affects the realm of private Would Habermas say: “… the Border Between the private sphere and scope of domestic public opinion, Traversed the house.” In This sense, the house is a global village, is a multicultural Society united by information networks, Where There Is Imminent Risk, staff observe and question other values.
In MOST inherited diseases, can only be detected after-adolescence, diagnosis Should Be Made to Prevent, for example, cystic fibrosis, polycystic kidney disease. And here Enters Another important question: Why do people crave Genetically perfect? Is not science starting with an idealization of Human Beings? How far the genetic basis have roots in the Holocaust In Which Hitler wanted the perfect human race on the outside of phenotype individual perfection based on eye color, skin experimenting with Jews?
Clearly, the concept of the individual STIs is Transform into social role and family role in genetic testing have to Provide confidential information Some insurance companies WHERE May Use this information for benefits wrongly Different, here come the notion of classical sociology is Point to Helena by Bejar “classical sociology the turn of the century lost sight of the issue of privacy.”
Must enter dissociate Sociology allow private genetic information it Will not publish (as Before, for example-through drama or tabloid) This Information is not as the patient’s present only, But A possible future of Their psychic condition. In This Regard, it Should Be a Christian bioethics as an efficient Means to propagate the notion of Dignity and worth of human life, not could be imminently Which interference with personal or private data. The worldview bioethics to help a social purpose: the common good and to Understand the Past Through the present, Procera AVH genetic analysis Will help with bone, fiber, and Sometimes XIV Carbon-through dates and documents to construct or reconstruct determine the past and imagination technology today.
The other problem Established in the Department of Life and Human Genetics (November 2005) Was the experimentation with Embryos left over what do with Them Were Presented In This Regard two powerful Reasons That May Help Understand the solution: first: cloning Before the destruction of the embryo and, second, the freezing of the Same. But That We Should Consider the human genome (if it is Considered property of Humanity) is a plan of Democratic Equality Countries seeking Situations forecasts and Assessments of the Inhabitants, if Democracy (as Discussed in class WAS) is based on the Development of skills, Relationships free and equal, so Should Be the Human Genome Project, free, With The Scientific and Technical skills to create new life, but not to Improve Conditions Necessarily Eliminate Imperfections remove or fetus, here come the problem of speech to accept someone as it is with birth defects and Their Characteristics positive and the point of loving a human being “perfect” from the standpoint of genetics to be shaped by plastic Into the other imperfect, like Planned construction Should Be Monitored and controlled by human hands, Forgetting the Divine Being superior, omnipotent.
It is important to Consider That There is Economic Progress for Countries to Conduct studies of the human genome. “Many European governments set-up Committees to Consider the Risks Involved and ethics, and discussions continued. The public Hardly Noticed the Existence of Critics Who deplore the notion of Manipulating the nature and mix of genetic information from Different species …” ( Mae-Wan Ho, 2002: 22).
The problem of public opinion, facts are scientific That is not always interpreted Reported or CORRECTLY, let me Illustrated: Several years ago it said That the human WAS genome consists of 100,000 genes, now this myth to say Becomes Fact That only 30,000 to 60,000 Human Beings genes in DNA have load is Within the Chromosomes (XX for female, XY for male), and this is the study of gender WHERE plays a vital role to resolve Conflicts sexual or gender identity roles and Changes in the role as Minorities Within a dynamic, diverse and Above All That Seems to be playing with the limits of the intimate, private and public-through the Internet Becomes Where the private public, to sort of Economic propaganda, is Captured by individual partner or company announcements Requesting anonymity and WHERE is always online and Will Be a Risk Factor. Would it be important to ask how far You Can file a “cyber socialization” or socializing at a distance and If This term apply to meet Would people really do not know Who in person, where, feelings, Which was intimate-like gestures in the Bourgeoisie (minority enlightened public opinion) – Should Be Kept hidden, valued at one’s self.